Host command execution via shell-interpolated tool arguments
Published Jun 26, 2025 · Updated Jun 26, 2025
OS command injection in iOS Simulator MCP Server before 1.3.3 allows local users to execute commands through crafted tool arguments. The ui_tap tool concatenates duration, UDID, and coordinate values into an idb command passed to child_process.exec, letting shell metacharacters alter the command line. Exploitation requires an MCP client or language model to submit attacker-influenced tool arguments, and injected commands run with the server process privileges.
Summary
What happened
OS command injection in iOS Simulator MCP Server before 1.3.3 allows local users to execute commands through crafted tool arguments. The ui_tap tool concatenates duration, UDID, and coordinate values into an idb command passed to child_process.exec, letting shell metacharacters alter the command line. Exploitation requires an MCP client or language model to submit attacker-influenced tool arguments, and injected commands run with the server process privileges.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-52573
- Published
- Jun 26, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 26, 2025
- Vendor
- Joshua Yoes
- Product
- iOS Simulator MCP Server
- Classifications
- CWE-78, T1059.004
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 26, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jun 26, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 1.3.3
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo