Stored XSS via forged privileged requests
Published Dec 31, 2025 · Updated Dec 31, 2025
Cross-site request forgery in Recent Posts From Each Category 1.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to store script in WordPress. Patchstack has not disclosed the affected handler, parameter, storage path, or the request-validation operation that fails. Exploitation requires a logged-in privileged user to visit attacker-controlled content; the forged request stores script that runs for users who view the affected output.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in Recent Posts From Each Category 1.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to store script in WordPress. Patchstack has not disclosed the affected handler, parameter, storage path, or the request-validation operation that fails. Exploitation requires a logged-in privileged user to visit attacker-controlled content; the forged request stores script that runs for users who view the affected output.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-49354
- Published
- Dec 31, 2025
- Updated
- Dec 31, 2025
- Vendor
- Mindstien Technologies
- Product
- Recent Posts From Each Category
- Classifications
- CWE-352, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 31, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 31, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=1.4
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
No CVSS assessment is available in this record.
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo