Stored XSS via cross-site request forgery
Published Aug 28, 2025 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in dactum Clickbank WordPress Plugin (Niche Storefront) 1.3.5 and earlier allows remote attackers to store scripts. Published sources do not identify the affected administrative action, missing request-verification check, or storage sink that accepts attacker-controlled script content. Exploitation requires an authenticated WordPress user to act on a crafted request, after which stored script content executes in later browser sessions.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in dactum Clickbank WordPress Plugin (Niche Storefront) 1.3.5 and earlier allows remote attackers to store scripts. Published sources do not identify the affected administrative action, missing request-verification check, or storage sink that accepts attacker-controlled script content. Exploitation requires an authenticated WordPress user to act on a crafted request, after which stored script content executes in later browser sessions.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-48353
- Published
- Aug 28, 2025
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- dactum
- Product
- Clickbank WordPress Plugin (Niche Storefront)
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-592
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 28, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.3.5
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo