Stored XSS via unsafe PDF FontMatrix compilation
Published Jun 24, 2025 · Updated Jul 30, 2025
Stored XSS in Gogs 0.14.0+dev and earlier allows remote authenticated users to execute JavaScript through a malicious PDF preview. The bundled pdf.js 1.4.20 renderer accepts nonnumeric Type 1 FontMatrix values, concatenates them into glyph-path JavaScript, and passes the result to Function. An attacker needs repository write access to store the PDF, and a victim must preview it; execution occurs in the Gogs origin and can expose browser-accessible data or alter displayed content.
Summary
What happened
Stored XSS in Gogs 0.14.0+dev and earlier allows remote authenticated users to execute JavaScript through a malicious PDF preview. The bundled pdf.js 1.4.20 renderer accepts nonnumeric Type 1 FontMatrix values, concatenates them into glyph-path JavaScript, and passes the result to Function. An attacker needs repository write access to store the PDF, and a victim must preview it; execution occurs in the Gogs origin and can expose browser-accessible data or alter displayed content.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-47943
- Published
- Jun 24, 2025
- Updated
- Jul 30, 2025
- Vendor
- Gogs
- Product
- Gogs
- Classifications
- CWE-79, T1204.002, T1059.007
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 24, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 30, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=<= 0.14.0+dev
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Generalized malicious PDF proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo