Cache poisoning via skipped CRLF chunk delimiters
Published May 13, 2025 · Updated May 29, 2025
HTTP request smuggling in Varnish Cache allows remote attackers to poison downstream caches via malformed HTTP/1 chunked requests. The HTTP/1 chunk parser incorrectly permits CRLF bytes to be skipped when delimiting chunk boundaries, causing inconsistent message framing. Exploitation requires a downstream cache or WAF that accepts the malformed request; consequences are malicious cached content or bypassed request inspection.
Summary
What happened
HTTP request smuggling in Varnish Cache allows remote attackers to poison downstream caches via malformed HTTP/1 chunked requests. The HTTP/1 chunk parser incorrectly permits CRLF bytes to be skipped when delimiting chunk boundaries, causing inconsistent message framing. Exploitation requires a downstream cache or WAF that accepts the malformed request; consequences are malicious cached content or bypassed request inspection.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-47905
- Published
- May 13, 2025
- Updated
- May 29, 2025
- Vendor
- Varnish Software
- Product
- Varnish Cache
- Classifications
- CWE-444, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 13, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 29, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <6.0.14 LTS
- Affected versionversion=7.0.0 <7.6.3
- Affected versionversion=7.7.0 <7.7.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo