CVE-2025-47822Public exploit

Device compromise via unauthenticated EDL memory access

Published Jun 27, 2025 · Updated Sep 2, 2025

Improper access control in Flock Safety LPR firmware through 2.2 allows physically proximate attackers to read and modify device storage. The OpenQ 624A module's EDL interface accepts an unsigned Firehose loader, while disabled secure boot and an unlocked bootloader permit unrestricted memory access and modified firmware. Exploitation requires physical access, opening the camera, switching its carrier-board DIP switch, and attaching micro-USB; successful access permits data extraction, persistent code modification, and full device compromise.

CVSS severity6.8
Medium
EPSS probability0.22%
Next 30 days · Sep 16, 2026
Known exploitationUnconfirmed
Based on sourced intelligence
Hinoki checkNot available
Coverage for this vulnerability

See if you're affected

Explore vulnerability checks for your environment with Hinoki.

Book a demo

Summary

What happened

Improper access control in Flock Safety LPR firmware through 2.2 allows physically proximate attackers to read and modify device storage. The OpenQ 624A module's EDL interface accepts an unsigned Firehose loader, while disabled secure boot and an unlocked bootloader permit unrestricted memory access and modified firmware. Exploitation requires physical access, opening the camera, switching its carrier-board DIP switch, and attaching micro-USB; successful access permits data extraction, persistent code modification, and full device compromise.

The record

CVE
CVE-2025-47822
Published
Jun 27, 2025
Updated
Sep 2, 2025
Vendor
Flock Safety
Product
Flock LPR
Classifications
CWE-1191, T1542.003
Attack vector
physical
Privileges
unauthenticated

Timeline

How it unfolded

  1. Jun 27, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
  2. Sep 2, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.

Exploitability

Present is not the same as exploitable

Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.

Is a vulnerable build present?

Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.

  1. Affected versionversion=0 <=2.2

What conditions does exploitation require?

Attack vectorphysical
Required privilegesunauthenticated

What is affected?

Flock Safety · Flock LPRversion=0 <=2.2

Published CVSS scores

6.4MITRECVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
6.8NVDCVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.

Attacks

What attackers are doing with it

Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.

Daily unique IPsNo honeypot observations are available for this CVE in the selected window.

No observations available

Sep 10, 2026Sep 16, 2026
Latest reporting daySep 16, 2026
Latest daily unique IPsUnavailable
Prior 30-day averageUnavailable
SourceShadowserver honeypots (KEV)
Vectorphysical
Privilegesunauthenticated
Known exploitationUnconfirmed
Public exploitPublished

Weakness, pattern, technique

CWE-1191On-Chip Debug and Test Interface With Improper Access Control
T1542.003Bootkit

Public exploit references

Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.

Technologies

Your stack

See the directory against your own environment.

Your stack

Check the software in your environment

Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.

Book a demo