Product-feed regeneration via missing request nonce
Published May 7, 2025 · Updated May 12, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in Awin – Advertiser Tracking for WooCommerce 2.0.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to regenerate product feeds. The feed-generation handler accepts a state-changing request without a WordPress nonce, so the victim's authenticated browser can submit it. Exploitation requires an authenticated higher-privileged user to load an attacker-controlled request; the reported effect is product-feed regeneration.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in Awin – Advertiser Tracking for WooCommerce 2.0.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to regenerate product feeds. The feed-generation handler accepts a state-changing request without a WordPress nonce, so the victim's authenticated browser can submit it. Exploitation requires an authenticated higher-privileged user to load an attacker-controlled request; the reported effect is product-feed regeneration.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-47633
- Published
- May 7, 2025
- Updated
- May 12, 2026
- Vendor
- Awin
- Product
- Awin – Advertiser Tracking for WooCommerce
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-62, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 7, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 12, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=2.0.0 changes=[{"at":"2.0.1","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo