Unauthorized settings changes via missing nonce validation
Published May 7, 2025 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
CSRF in EasyMe Connect 3.0.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to alter WordPress admin settings via a forged request. The plugin processes admin settings form submissions without verifying a WordPress nonce, so attacker-supplied values execute in an administrator's session. Exploitation requires a logged-in administrator to visit or submit attacker-controlled content; the documented impact is limited to unauthorized settings changes.
Summary
What happened
CSRF in EasyMe Connect 3.0.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to alter WordPress admin settings via a forged request. The plugin processes admin settings form submissions without verifying a WordPress nonce, so attacker-supplied values execute in an administrator's session. Exploitation requires a logged-in administrator to visit or submit attacker-controlled content; the documented impact is limited to unauthorized settings changes.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-47609
- Published
- May 7, 2025
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- EasyMe ApS
- Product
- EasyMe Connect
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-62, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 7, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=3.0.3 changes=[{"at":"3.0.4","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo