Stored XSS via forged privileged-user requests
Published Apr 24, 2025 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in Print Science Designer 1.3.155 and earlier allows remote attackers to store scripts through forged requests. Patchstack has not disclosed the affected request handler, input field, or missing validation that permits attacker-supplied script content to be stored. Exploitation requires a logged-in privileged user to visit or act on attacker-controlled content, after which the stored script executes in a later visitor's browser.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in Print Science Designer 1.3.155 and earlier allows remote attackers to store scripts through forged requests. Patchstack has not disclosed the affected request handler, input field, or missing validation that permits attacker-supplied script content to be stored. Exploitation requires a logged-in privileged user to visit or act on attacker-controlled content, after which the stored script executes in a later visitor's browser.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-46465
- Published
- Apr 24, 2025
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- John Weissberg
- Product
- Print Science Designer
- Classifications
- CWE-352, T1189
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 24, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.3.155
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo