Code execution via wrapped BMP palette allocation
Published Aug 25, 2025 · Updated Nov 3, 2025
Memory corruption in SAIL 0.9.8 allows remote attackers to execute code when a user or application loads a crafted BMP image. In bmp_private_read_init, the untrusted v3.colors_used count is multiplied by four in 32-bit arithmetic, allocating a wrapped, undersized palette buffer before the same count controls out-of-bounds pixel writes. The overflow requires a 32-bit build and execution occurs in the context of the process that opens the image, with user or application file loading as the trigger.
Summary
What happened
Memory corruption in SAIL 0.9.8 allows remote attackers to execute code when a user or application loads a crafted BMP image. In bmp_private_read_init, the untrusted v3.colors_used count is multiplied by four in 32-bit arithmetic, allocating a wrapped, undersized palette buffer before the same count controls out-of-bounds pixel writes. The overflow requires a 32-bit build and execution occurs in the context of the process that opens the image, with user or application file loading as the trigger.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-46407
- Published
- Aug 25, 2025
- Updated
- Nov 3, 2025
- Vendor
- SAIL
- Product
- SAIL
- Classifications
- CWE-680, T1203, T1204.002
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 25, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 3, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=v0.9.8
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Cisco Talos crafted BMP proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo