Unauthorized administrative actions via forged requests
Published Apr 22, 2025 · Updated May 12, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in CreativeMinds CM Ad Changer 2.0.5 and earlier allows remote attackers to force unwanted administrative actions. Patchstack and the vendor changelog do not identify the affected request handler, missing validation, or specific action performed. Exploitation requires a privileged user with an active WordPress session to open attacker-controlled content, and the published impact is limited to unauthorized state changes.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in CreativeMinds CM Ad Changer 2.0.5 and earlier allows remote attackers to force unwanted administrative actions. Patchstack and the vendor changelog do not identify the affected request handler, missing validation, or specific action performed. Exploitation requires a privileged user with an active WordPress session to open attacker-controlled content, and the published impact is limited to unauthorized state changes.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-46245
- Published
- Apr 22, 2025
- Updated
- May 12, 2026
- Vendor
- CreativeMinds
- Product
- CM Ad Changer
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-62, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 22, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 12, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=2.0.5 changes=[{"at":"2.0.6","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo