OAuth credential theft via callback host manipulation
Published Jul 13, 2026 · Updated Jul 13, 2026
SSRF in LogicalDOC Enterprise 9.1.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to send OAuth token requests to attacker-controlled hosts. The unauthenticated ShareFileCallback servlet uses attacker-controlled apicp and subdomain parameters as the token endpoint and posts a user's ShareFile OAuth client ID and secret there. The attack requires configured ShareFile credentials and a valid state value for an existing user; it exposes that user's credentials to the attacker-controlled endpoint.
Summary
What happened
SSRF in LogicalDOC Enterprise 9.1.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to send OAuth token requests to attacker-controlled hosts. The unauthenticated ShareFileCallback servlet uses attacker-controlled apicp and subdomain parameters as the token endpoint and posts a user's ShareFile OAuth client ID and secret there. The attack requires configured ShareFile credentials and a valid state value for an existing user; it exposes that user's credentials to the attacker-controlled endpoint.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-45869
- Published
- Jul 13, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 13, 2026
- Vendor
- Unknown vendor
- Product
- Unknown product
- Classifications
- CWE-918, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 13, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 13, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Affected products and versions are unavailable in this record.
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo