Denial of service via trusted SPA header
Published Apr 25, 2025 · Updated Apr 25, 2025
Denial of service in React Router 7.2.0 through 7.5.1 allows remote attackers to corrupt cached SSR responses via a request header. The server runtime trusts the X-React-Router-SPA-Mode build-time header at runtime, switches an SSR request to SPA mode, and throws on loader-backed routes. Exploitation requires Framework Mode, SSR, a loader-backed route, and a cache that stores the resulting error response, which can leave the affected page persistently unusable.
Summary
What happened
Denial of service in React Router 7.2.0 through 7.5.1 allows remote attackers to corrupt cached SSR responses via a request header. The server runtime trusts the X-React-Router-SPA-Mode build-time header at runtime, switches an SSR request to SPA mode, and throws on loader-backed routes. Exploitation requires Framework Mode, SSR, a loader-backed route, and a cache that stores the resulting error response, which can leave the affected page persistently unusable.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-43864
- Published
- Apr 25, 2025
- Updated
- Apr 25, 2025
- Vendor
- Shopify
- Product
- React Router
- Classifications
- CWE-755, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 25, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 25, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=>= 7.2.0, < 7.5.2
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Maintainer advisory reproduction stepsproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo