Protected file modification via incorrect CoreServices permissions
Published May 26, 2026 · Updated May 26, 2026
macOS Sonoma before 14.8, Sequoia before 15.7, and Tahoe before 26 allows local users to modify protected file-system content. Apple identifies CoreServices as the locus but discloses only that its permission restrictions are insufficient; the affected resource and operation are not public. Exploitation requires a locally executed app with low privileges and permits protected file-system changes, with no reported confidentiality or availability impact.
Summary
What happened
macOS Sonoma before 14.8, Sequoia before 15.7, and Tahoe before 26 allows local users to modify protected file-system content. Apple identifies CoreServices as the locus but discloses only that its permission restrictions are insufficient; the affected resource and operation are not public. Exploitation requires a locally executed app with low privileges and permits protected file-system changes, with no reported confidentiality or availability impact.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-43290
- Published
- May 26, 2026
- Updated
- May 26, 2026
- Vendor
- Apple
- Product
- macOS
- Classifications
- CWE-732, T1565.001
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 26, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 26, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <14.8
- Affected versionversion=0 <15.7
- Affected versionversion=0 <26
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo