TCP retransmission failure via stale Fast Open state
Published Oct 9, 2025 · Updated Oct 9, 2025
State-management failure in affected Linux kernels allows local users to suppress a TCP retransmission through Fast Open socket reuse. tcp_disconnect() closes an accepted server-side Fast Open socket without removing tcp_sk(sk)->fastopen_rsk, so a later retransmit timer encounters stale request state. Triggering the flaw requires disconnecting the accepted socket before its three-way handshake completes and reconnecting it elsewhere; the documented result is a kernel warning and one intended packet not being retransmitted.
Summary
What happened
State-management failure in affected Linux kernels allows local users to suppress a TCP retransmission through Fast Open socket reuse. tcp_disconnect() closes an accepted server-side Fast Open socket without removing tcp_sk(sk)->fastopen_rsk, so a later retransmit timer encounters stale request state. Triggering the flaw requires disconnecting the accepted socket before its three-way handshake completes and reconnecting it elsewhere; the documented result is a kernel warning and one intended packet not being retransmitted.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-39955
- Published
- Oct 9, 2025
- Updated
- Oct 9, 2025
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux
- Classifications
- Unavailable
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Oct 9, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Oct 9, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=3.7
- Affected versionversion=8336886f786fdacbc19b719c1f7ea91eb70706d4 <17d699727577814198d744d6afe54735c6b54c99
- Affected versionversion=8336886f786fdacbc19b719c1f7ea91eb70706d4 <33a4fdf0b4a25f8ce65380c3b0136b407ca57609
- Affected versionversion=8336886f786fdacbc19b719c1f7ea91eb70706d4 <45c8a6cc2bcd780e634a6ba8e46bffbdf1fc5c01
- Affected versionversion=8336886f786fdacbc19b719c1f7ea91eb70706d4 <7ec092a91ff351dcde89c23e795b73a328274db6
- Affected versionversion=8336886f786fdacbc19b719c1f7ea91eb70706d4 <a4378dedd6e07e62f2fccb17d78c9665718763d0
- Affected versionversion=8336886f786fdacbc19b719c1f7ea91eb70706d4 <ae313d14b45eca7a6bb29cb9bf396d977e7d28fb
- Affected versionversion=8336886f786fdacbc19b719c1f7ea91eb70706d4 <dfd06131107e7b699ef1e2a24ed2f7d17c917753
- Affected versionversion=8336886f786fdacbc19b719c1f7ea91eb70706d4 <fa4749c065644af4db496b338452a69a3e5147d9
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
No sourced classifications are available.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo