Kernel crash via unchecked interval allocation failure
Published Oct 1, 2025 · Updated May 11, 2026
NULL-pointer dereference in Linux kernel PCMCIA memory validation allows local users to crash the system during allocation failure. do_validate_mem() ignores an add_interval() allocation error, allowing a null pointer to enter its interval list before sub_interval() dereferences it. Reachability requires local low-privileged access, the PCMCIA memory-validation path, and a failed kmalloc(); the bounded consequence is a kernel crash.
Summary
What happened
NULL-pointer dereference in Linux kernel PCMCIA memory validation allows local users to crash the system during allocation failure. do_validate_mem() ignores an add_interval() allocation error, allowing a null pointer to enter its interval list before sub_interval() dereferences it. Reachability requires local low-privileged access, the PCMCIA memory-validation path, and a failed kmalloc(); the bounded consequence is a kernel crash.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-39920
- Published
- Oct 1, 2025
- Updated
- May 11, 2026
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux
- Classifications
- CWE-476, T1499
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Oct 1, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 11, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=2.6.34
- Affected versionversion=7b4884ca8853a638df0eb5d251d80d67777b8b1a <06b26e3099207c94b3d1be8565aedc6edc4f0a60
- Affected versionversion=7b4884ca8853a638df0eb5d251d80d67777b8b1a <289b58f8ff3198d091074a751d6b8f6827726f3e
- Affected versionversion=7b4884ca8853a638df0eb5d251d80d67777b8b1a <369bf6e241506583f4ee7593c53b92e5a9f271b4
- Affected versionversion=7b4884ca8853a638df0eb5d251d80d67777b8b1a <4a81f78caa53e0633cf311ca1526377d9bff7479
- Affected versionversion=7b4884ca8853a638df0eb5d251d80d67777b8b1a <5b60ed401b47897352c520bc724c85aa908dedcc
- Affected versionversion=7b4884ca8853a638df0eb5d251d80d67777b8b1a <85be7ef8c8e792a414940a38d94565dd48d2f236
- Affected versionversion=7b4884ca8853a638df0eb5d251d80d67777b8b1a <8699358b6ac99b8ccc97ed9e6e3669ef8958ef7b
- Affected versionversion=7b4884ca8853a638df0eb5d251d80d67777b8b1a <ae184024ef31423e5beb44cf4f52999bbcf2fe5b
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo