Service interruption via loopback route reference leak
Published Sep 5, 2025 · Updated Sep 8, 2026
A netfilter reference-count leak in Linux and affected Siemens firmware allows local users to exhaust kernel resources with loopback rejects. nf_reject_fill_skb_dst replaces an attached dst_entry on loopback packets without releasing the prior reference because it tests the hook instead of route presence. Low-privileged local access and a netfilter reject path handling loopback traffic are required; repeated triggers exhaust route references and interrupt service.
Summary
What happened
A netfilter reference-count leak in Linux and affected Siemens firmware allows local users to exhaust kernel resources with loopback rejects. nf_reject_fill_skb_dst replaces an attached dst_entry on loopback packets without releasing the prior reference because it tests the hook instead of route presence. Low-privileged local access and a netfilter reject path handling loopback traffic are required; repeated triggers exhaust route references and interrupt service.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-38732
- Published
- Sep 5, 2025
- Updated
- Sep 8, 2026
- Vendor
- Siemens
- Product
- SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP
- Classifications
- CWE-911, T1499
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 5, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 8, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=V3.1.6 <*
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo