Firmware memory corruption via oversized transportLen copy
Published Nov 17, 2025 · Updated Nov 17, 2025
Buffer overflow in Dell ControlVault3 before 5.15.14.19 and ControlVault3 Plus before 6.2.36.47 allows local users to corrupt firmware memory. CvManager passes the attacker-controlled transportLen value to memcpy after validation permits 0x10080 bytes, although CV_COMMAND_BUF holds only 4,096 bytes. Any low-privilege Windows user can reach the firmware through the ControlVault DLL and driver, allowing corruption of adjacent heap metadata and session objects.
Summary
What happened
Buffer overflow in Dell ControlVault3 before 5.15.14.19 and ControlVault3 Plus before 6.2.36.47 allows local users to corrupt firmware memory. CvManager passes the attacker-controlled transportLen value to memcpy after validation permits 0x10080 bytes, although CV_COMMAND_BUF holds only 4,096 bytes. Any low-privilege Windows user can reach the firmware through the ControlVault DLL and driver, allowing corruption of adjacent heap metadata and session objects.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-36553
- Published
- Nov 17, 2025
- Updated
- Nov 17, 2025
- Vendor
- Dell
- Product
- ControlVault3 Plus
- Classifications
- CWE-120, T1068
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 17, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 17, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <6.2.36.47
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo