Sensitive information disclosure via insecure SameSite cookie
Published Nov 25, 2025 · Updated Nov 25, 2025
Improper cookie handling in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator and Sterling File Gateway allows remote attackers to read sensitive information. Affected releases issue a sensitive cookie without a secure SameSite restriction, allowing browsers to attach it to cross-site requests. Exploitation requires a network-reachable web interface and a cross-site request context; the disclosed impact is limited to sensitive-information exposure.
Summary
What happened
Improper cookie handling in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator and Sterling File Gateway allows remote attackers to read sensitive information. Affected releases issue a sensitive cookie without a secure SameSite restriction, allowing browsers to attach it to cross-site requests. Exploitation requires a network-reachable web interface and a cross-site request context; the disclosed impact is limited to sensitive-information exposure.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-36134
- Published
- Nov 25, 2025
- Updated
- Nov 25, 2025
- Vendor
- IBM
- Product
- IBM Sterling File Gateway
- Classifications
- CWE-1275, CAPEC-62
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 25, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 25, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=6.0.0.0 <=6.1.2.7
- Affected versionversion=6.2.0.0 <=6.2.0.5
- Affected versionversion=6.2.1.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo