Authenticated unauthorized actions via client-side security enforcement
Published Jul 30, 2025 · Updated Jul 31, 2025
Improper authorization in IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.0 through 5.0.12.1 allows remote authenticated users to perform unauthorized actions. The web client enforces a server-side security decision that the server does not independently validate; IBM has not identified the affected request or authorization check. Low-privileged network access is required, and the documented consequence is unauthorized modification without reported disclosure or service interruption.
Summary
What happened
Improper authorization in IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.0 through 5.0.12.1 allows remote authenticated users to perform unauthorized actions. The web client enforces a server-side security decision that the server does not independently validate; IBM has not identified the affected request or authorization check. Low-privileged network access is required, and the documented consequence is unauthorized modification without reported disclosure or service interruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-36039
- Published
- Jul 30, 2025
- Updated
- Jul 31, 2025
- Vendor
- IBM
- Product
- IBM Aspera Faspex
- Classifications
- CWE-602
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 30, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 31, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=5.0.0 <=5.0.12.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo