Unauthenticated elevated command execution via crafted HTTP requests
Published Jun 24, 2025 · Updated Jul 14, 2026
OS command injection in Sangfor EDR Manager 3.2.16, 3.2.17, and 3.2.19 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary system commands. The EDR Manager processes attacker-controlled content from malicious HTTP requests as system commands without neutralizing command elements. Unauthenticated network access to a Chinese-language build is sufficient, and commands run with elevated privileges.
Summary
What happened
OS command injection in Sangfor EDR Manager 3.2.16, 3.2.17, and 3.2.19 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary system commands. The EDR Manager processes attacker-controlled content from malicious HTTP requests as system commands without neutralizing command elements. Unauthenticated network access to a Chinese-language build is sufficient, and commands run with elevated privileges.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-34041
- Published
- Jun 24, 2025
- Updated
- Jul 14, 2026
- Vendor
- Sangfor Technologies
- Product
- Sangfor Athena EPP
- Classifications
- CWE-78, CAPEC-88, T1059
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 4, 2025Exploitation reportedShadowserver reported exploitation
- Jun 24, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 14, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=3.2.16
- Affected versionversion=3.2.17
- Affected versionversion=3.2.19
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Reported exploitation
- Shadowserver reported exploitationreported exploitation
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo