Subscriber-level database disclosure via unescaped SQL parameter
Published Jul 16, 2025 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
SQL injection in Mojoomla WPGYM 65.0 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to extract sensitive database information. A user-supplied request parameter is insufficiently escaped and incorporated into an existing database query without adequate preparation; public sources do not identify the parameter or code locus. Subscriber-level WordPress access is required, and the documented consequence is database disclosure rather than data modification.
Summary
What happened
SQL injection in Mojoomla WPGYM 65.0 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to extract sensitive database information. A user-supplied request parameter is insufficiently escaped and incorporated into an existing database query without adequate preparation; public sources do not identify the parameter or code locus. Subscriber-level WordPress access is required, and the documented consequence is database disclosure rather than data modification.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-32574
- Published
- Jul 16, 2025
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- Mojoomla
- Product
- WPGYM - WordPress Gym Management System
- Classifications
- CWE-89, CAPEC-66, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 16, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=65.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo