Subscriber upload-limit bypass via modified requests
Published Apr 10, 2025 · Updated Apr 29, 2026
Authentication bypass in Asgaros Forum 3.0.0 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to upload more attachments than configured. The attachment-upload path in affected releases accepts client-modified requests with more files than the configured per-post maximum instead of enforcing the count server-side. Subscriber access is required; the demonstrated consequence is excess file storage, with no reported code execution or data disclosure.
Summary
What happened
Authentication bypass in Asgaros Forum 3.0.0 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to upload more attachments than configured. The attachment-upload path in affected releases accepts client-modified requests with more files than the configured per-post maximum instead of enforcing the count server-side. Subscriber access is required; the demonstrated consequence is excess file storage, with no reported code execution or data disclosure.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-32227
- Published
- Apr 10, 2025
- Updated
- Apr 29, 2026
- Vendor
- Asgaros
- Product
- Asgaros Forum
- Classifications
- CWE-290, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 10, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 29, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=3.0.0 changes=[{"at":"3.1.0","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo