Forced privileged actions via undisclosed request handler
Published Mar 31, 2025 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in AdminGeekZ Varnish WordPress 1.7 and earlier allows remote attackers to force privileged actions. The public record does not identify the request handler or state-changing operation, but Patchstack states that forged requests execute under a victim's authenticated session. Exploitation requires a privileged user to click a malicious link, visit a crafted page, or submit a form; the resulting action and stored-XSS mechanism are undisclosed.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in AdminGeekZ Varnish WordPress 1.7 and earlier allows remote attackers to force privileged actions. The public record does not identify the request handler or state-changing operation, but Patchstack states that forged requests execute under a victim's authenticated session. Exploitation requires a privileged user to click a malicious link, visit a crafted page, or submit a form; the resulting action and stored-XSS mechanism are undisclosed.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-31616
- Published
- Mar 31, 2025
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- AdminGeekZ
- Product
- Varnish WordPress
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-62, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 31, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.7
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo