Authenticated data modification via user-controlled record key
Published Aug 12, 2025 · Updated Aug 12, 2025
Broken access control in ServiceNow AI Platform allows remote authenticated users to perform higher-privilege actions and modify data. The published weakness mapping identifies a user-controlled record key accepted without an entitlement check, but ServiceNow has not disclosed the affected endpoint, parameter, or authorization routine. A low-privileged account is required, and the reported consequence is limited to a subset of higher-privilege actions and unauthorized data changes.
Summary
What happened
Broken access control in ServiceNow AI Platform allows remote authenticated users to perform higher-privilege actions and modify data. The published weakness mapping identifies a user-controlled record key accepted without an entitlement check, but ServiceNow has not disclosed the affected endpoint, parameter, or authorization routine. A low-privileged account is required, and the reported consequence is limited to a subset of higher-privilege actions and unauthorized data changes.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-3089
- Published
- Aug 12, 2025
- Updated
- Aug 12, 2025
- Vendor
- ServiceNow
- Product
- ServiceNow AI Platform
- Classifications
- CWE-639
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 12, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 12, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=Aspen <Washington DC Patch 10 Hot Fix 2a
- Affected versionversion=Aspen <Xanadu Patch 7a
- Affected versionversion=Aspen <Xanadu Patch 8
- Affected versionversion=Aspen <Yokohama Patch 1a
- Affected versionversion=Aspen <Yokohama Patch 2
- Affected versionversion=Aspen <Zurich (EA)
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo