Settings changes via missing CSRF nonce validation
Published Mar 27, 2025 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in AntoineH Football Pool 2.12.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to alter plugin settings. The unnamed settings-update function accepts a state-changing request without valid WordPress nonce verification; no more specific code locus is public. Exploitation requires an administrator with an authenticated WordPress session to visit an attacker-controlled link, limiting the consequence to documented plugin settings changes.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in AntoineH Football Pool 2.12.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to alter plugin settings. The unnamed settings-update function accepts a state-changing request without valid WordPress nonce verification; no more specific code locus is public. Exploitation requires an administrator with an authenticated WordPress session to visit an attacker-controlled link, limiting the consequence to documented plugin settings changes.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-30764
- Published
- Mar 27, 2025
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- AntoineH
- Product
- Football Pool
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-62, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 27, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=2.12.2 changes=[{"at":"2.12.3","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo