Unauthorized actions via undisclosed forged requests
Published Mar 24, 2025 · Updated May 11, 2026
CSRF in boroV Cackle 4.33 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause an authenticated user to submit unauthorized requests. The published advisory does not identify the affected endpoint or state-changing operation and provides no details about the missing request-validation control. Exploitation requires user interaction in an authenticated browser session, and the published impact is limited to unauthorized modification without reported data disclosure or service interruption.
Summary
What happened
CSRF in boroV Cackle 4.33 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause an authenticated user to submit unauthorized requests. The published advisory does not identify the affected endpoint or state-changing operation and provides no details about the missing request-validation control. Exploitation requires user interaction in an authenticated browser session, and the published impact is limited to unauthorized modification without reported data disclosure or service interruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-30546
- Published
- Mar 24, 2025
- Updated
- May 11, 2026
- Vendor
- boroV
- Product
- Cackle
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-62
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 24, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 11, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=4.33
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo