Unauthenticated memory exhaustion via oversized KEXINIT names
Published Mar 28, 2025 · Updated Nov 3, 2025
Denial of service in Erlang/OTP SSH allows remote attackers to exhaust memory through a malicious KEXINIT message. The SSH KEXINIT handler fails to enforce the RFC's 64-character limit on algorithm names and inefficiently constructs error data for an oversized packet. An unauthenticated client that can reach an enabled Erlang SSH daemon can consume large amounts of host memory; no data disclosure or modification is reported.
Summary
What happened
Denial of service in Erlang/OTP SSH allows remote attackers to exhaust memory through a malicious KEXINIT message. The SSH KEXINIT handler fails to enforce the RFC's 64-character limit on algorithm names and inefficiently constructs error data for an oversized packet. An unauthenticated client that can reach an enabled Erlang SSH daemon can consume large amounts of host memory; no data disclosure or modification is reported.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-30211
- Published
- Mar 28, 2025
- Updated
- Nov 3, 2025
- Vendor
- Erlang
- Product
- Erlang/OTP
- Classifications
- CWE-789, T1499.003
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 28, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 3, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< OTP-25.3.2.19
- Affected versionversion=< OTP-26.2.5.10
- Affected versionversion=< OTP-27.3.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo