Host-memory corruption via unchecked syscall length
Published Aug 22, 2025 · Updated Aug 22, 2025
Buffer overflow in SPIM 9.1.24 and earlier allows attackers to corrupt host memory by running a crafted MIPS assembly program. READ_STRING_SYSCALL passes a guest-controlled destination and length to read_input after validating only the starting address, so input can cross the allocated virtual-memory segment boundary. Exploitation requires execution of attacker-supplied assembly in SPIM; the published proof of concept demonstrates an out-of-bounds host write, while arbitrary code execution is not demonstrated.
Summary
What happened
Buffer overflow in SPIM 9.1.24 and earlier allows attackers to corrupt host memory by running a crafted MIPS assembly program. READ_STRING_SYSCALL passes a guest-controlled destination and length to read_input after validating only the starting address, so input can cross the allocated virtual-memory segment boundary. Exploitation requires execution of attacker-supplied assembly in SPIM; the published proof of concept demonstrates an out-of-bounds host write, while arbitrary code execution is not demonstrated.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-29365
- Published
- Aug 22, 2025
- Updated
- Aug 22, 2025
- Vendor
- Unknown vendor
- Product
- Unknown product
- Classifications
- CWE-125, CWE-787, CWE-120, CWE-274
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- Unavailable
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 22, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 22, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Affected products and versions are unavailable in this record.
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- READ_STRING_SYSCALL proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo