Unauthenticated script execution in victim browsers
Published Aug 14, 2025 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Reflected XSS in REDQ Alike - WordPress Custom Post Comparison 3.0.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute script via crafted requests. Patchstack has not disclosed the affected request parameter, code locus, or precise output operation that reflects untrusted input into a page. Exploitation is unauthenticated but requires a user to follow a crafted link or otherwise submit the malicious request, allowing script execution in the victim's browser context.
Summary
What happened
Reflected XSS in REDQ Alike - WordPress Custom Post Comparison 3.0.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute script via crafted requests. Patchstack has not disclosed the affected request parameter, code locus, or precise output operation that reflects untrusted input into a page. Exploitation is unauthenticated but requires a user to follow a crafted link or otherwise submit the malicious request, allowing script execution in the victim's browser context.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-28975
- Published
- Aug 14, 2025
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- REDQ
- Product
- Alike - WordPress Custom Post Comparison
- Classifications
- CWE-79, CAPEC-591, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 14, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=3.0.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo