Forced privileged actions via crafted cross-site requests
Published Mar 11, 2025 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
CSRF in Rajesh Kumar WP Bulk Post Duplicator 1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to force unwanted actions through crafted requests. Patchstack has not disclosed the affected request handler, state-changing operation, or specific missing request validation. Exploitation requires a privileged authenticated user to interact with attacker-controlled content; the documented consequence is limited to unauthorized actions under that user's session.
Summary
What happened
CSRF in Rajesh Kumar WP Bulk Post Duplicator 1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to force unwanted actions through crafted requests. Patchstack has not disclosed the affected request handler, state-changing operation, or specific missing request validation. Exploitation requires a privileged authenticated user to interact with attacker-controlled content; the documented consequence is limited to unauthorized actions under that user's session.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-28884
- Published
- Mar 11, 2025
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- Rajesh Kumar
- Product
- WP Bulk Post Duplicator
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-62, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 11, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.2
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo