Unspecified state modification via forged requests
Published Feb 24, 2025 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in wptom All-In-One Cufon 1.3.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to modify unspecified plugin state. Public records identify neither the request handler nor the missing validation that permits a forged request to perform the state-changing operation. Exploitation requires an authenticated user with access to the affected operation to interact with attacker-controlled content; the precise configuration consequence is undisclosed.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in wptom All-In-One Cufon 1.3.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to modify unspecified plugin state. Public records identify neither the request handler nor the missing validation that permits a forged request to perform the state-changing operation. Exploitation requires an authenticated user with access to the affected operation to interact with attacker-controlled content; the precise configuration consequence is undisclosed.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-27315
- Published
- Feb 24, 2025
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- wptom
- Product
- All-In-One Cufon
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-62, T1204
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 24, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.3.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo