Unauthenticated code execution via unrestricted file upload
Published Apr 15, 2025 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Unrestricted file upload in LiquidThemes AI Hub 1.3.7 and earlier allows remote attackers to upload executable web shells. Patchstack identifies the flaw as an unauthenticated arbitrary upload but has not disclosed the affected handler or the failed file-type validation operation. No credentials or user interaction are required, and a server-executable upload grants code execution in the WordPress site's web-server context.
Summary
What happened
Unrestricted file upload in LiquidThemes AI Hub 1.3.7 and earlier allows remote attackers to upload executable web shells. Patchstack identifies the flaw as an unauthenticated arbitrary upload but has not disclosed the affected handler or the failed file-type validation operation. No credentials or user interaction are required, and a server-executable upload grants code execution in the WordPress site's web-server context.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-26927
- Published
- Apr 15, 2025
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- LiquidThemes
- Product
- AI Hub
- Classifications
- CWE-434, CAPEC-650, T1505.003
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 15, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.3.7 changes=[{"at":"1.3.8","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo