Stored XSS via forged settings update
Published Feb 13, 2025 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
CSRF in TinyMCE Advanced qTranslate fix editor problems 1.0.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to store scripts via forged requests. The settings-update function lacks nonce validation and accepts attacker-controlled values that WordPress later renders as stored script content. An administrator with an active WordPress session must follow an attacker-controlled link or submit a crafted form, after which the stored script executes in site visitors' browsers.
Summary
What happened
CSRF in TinyMCE Advanced qTranslate fix editor problems 1.0.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to store scripts via forged requests. The settings-update function lacks nonce validation and accepts attacker-controlled values that WordPress later renders as stored script content. An administrator with an active WordPress session must follow an attacker-controlled link or submit a crafted form, after which the stored script executes in site visitors' browsers.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-26582
- Published
- Feb 13, 2025
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- Blackbam
- Product
- TinyMCE Advanced qTranslate fix editor problems
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-592, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 13, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.0.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo