Server stall via predictable SCID hash collisions
Published Feb 20, 2025 · Updated Feb 20, 2025
Hash denial of service in Private Octopus picoquic before b80fd3f allows remote attackers to stall servers with colliding QUIC SCIDs. The connection-management picohash table keys peer-chosen SCIDs with a predictable unseeded hash, making crafted collisions drive quadratic insertion and lookup work. Any unauthenticated client able to reach a picoquic-based QUIC server can consume most of its CPU and substantially slow connection handling.
Summary
What happened
Hash denial of service in Private Octopus picoquic before b80fd3f allows remote attackers to stall servers with colliding QUIC SCIDs. The connection-management picohash table keys peer-chosen SCIDs with a predictable unseeded hash, making crafted collisions drive quadratic insertion and lookup work. Any unauthenticated client able to reach a picoquic-based QUIC server can consume most of its CPU and substantially slow connection handling.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-24946
- Published
- Feb 20, 2025
- Updated
- Feb 20, 2025
- Vendor
- Private Octopus
- Product
- picoquic
- Classifications
- CWE-407, T1499.002
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 20, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Feb 20, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <b80fd3f5903279ae3e7714ee4109363d9ab4491a
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo