Stored script execution via forged requests
Published Jan 16, 2025 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in Walter Cerrudo MFPlugin 1.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to plant stored script content. The public CNA record and its sole Patchstack reference do not identify the request handler, writable field, or missing validation that accepts attacker-controlled input. Exploitation requires a logged-in WordPress user to submit a forged request and later causes script execution in a visitor's browser under the affected site's origin.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in Walter Cerrudo MFPlugin 1.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to plant stored script content. The public CNA record and its sole Patchstack reference do not identify the request handler, writable field, or missing validation that accepts attacker-controlled input. Exploitation requires a logged-in WordPress user to submit a forged request and later causes script execution in a visitor's browser under the affected site's origin.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-23660
- Published
- Jan 16, 2025
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- Walter Cerrudo
- Product
- MFPlugin
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-592, T1059.007
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 16, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.3
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo