Authenticated service interruption via undisclosed authorization failure
Published Mar 3, 2025 · Updated May 12, 2026
Missing authorization in Mediabeta WP Journal 1.1 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to interrupt service. Neither the CNA record nor Patchstack identifies the affected function, request, privileged action, or missing check, so the exact mechanism is undisclosed. Subscriber-level access is required, and published impact is limited to availability without specifying whether exploitation causes a hang, crash, reboot, or other interruption.
Summary
What happened
Missing authorization in Mediabeta WP Journal 1.1 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to interrupt service. Neither the CNA record nor Patchstack identifies the affected function, request, privileged action, or missing check, so the exact mechanism is undisclosed. Subscriber-level access is required, and published impact is limited to availability without specifying whether exploitation causes a hang, crash, reboot, or other interruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-23613
- Published
- Mar 3, 2025
- Updated
- May 12, 2026
- Vendor
- Mediabeta
- Product
- WP Journal
- Classifications
- CWE-862, CAPEC-180
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 3, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 12, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo