Unauthorized data disclosure via incorrect Relay node resolution
Published Jan 9, 2025 · Updated Jan 9, 2025
Type confusion in Strawberry GraphQL 0.182.0 and later, before 0.257.0, allows remote attackers to read unauthorized data via global node queries. The relay node resolver returns an ORM model without retaining the GlobalID-selected GraphQL type, so is_type_of accepts the first registered type mapped to that model. Exposure requires multiple Relay Node types for one Django, SQLAlchemy, or Pydantic model and can reveal fields intended for a restricted type.
Summary
What happened
Type confusion in Strawberry GraphQL 0.182.0 and later, before 0.257.0, allows remote attackers to read unauthorized data via global node queries. The relay node resolver returns an ORM model without retaining the GlobalID-selected GraphQL type, so is_type_of accepts the first registered type mapped to that model. Exposure requires multiple Relay Node types for one Django, SQLAlchemy, or Pydantic model and can reveal fields intended for a restricted type.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-22151
- Published
- Jan 9, 2025
- Updated
- Jan 9, 2025
- Vendor
- Strawberry GraphQL
- Product
- Strawberry GraphQL
- Classifications
- CWE-843, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 9, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jan 9, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=>= 0.182.0, < 0.257.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo