Code execution via undersized continuation array
Published Mar 3, 2025 · Updated Mar 3, 2025
Buffer overflow in radareorg radare2 before 5.9.9 allows context-dependent attackers to crash the process or execute code via a crafted magic file. The __magic_file_check_mem function in libr/magic/funcs.c adds only 20 entries when a continuation level exceeds the allocated array, leaving high-index levels out of bounds. Processing attacker-controlled magic rules is the gate, and the resulting memory corruption allows a process crash or arbitrary code execution.
Summary
What happened
Buffer overflow in radareorg radare2 before 5.9.9 allows context-dependent attackers to crash the process or execute code via a crafted magic file. The __magic_file_check_mem function in libr/magic/funcs.c adds only 20 entries when a continuation level exceeds the allocated array, leaving high-index levels out of bounds. Processing attacker-controlled magic rules is the gate, and the resulting memory corruption allows a process crash or arbitrary code execution.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-1864
- Published
- Mar 3, 2025
- Updated
- Mar 3, 2025
- Vendor
- radareorg
- Product
- radare2
- Classifications
- CWE-120, CWE-119, CAPEC-100, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 3, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Mar 3, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <<5.9.9 changes=[{"at":"patch 5.9.9","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo