Unauthorized data modification via forged SG_Gravar request
Published Feb 25, 2025 · Updated Feb 25, 2025
Cross-site request forgery in Benner ModernaNet 1.2.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to alter data through a victim's browser. /DadosPessoais/SG_Gravar accepts an attacker-controlled idItAg value and processes the state-changing request without sufficient CSRF or authorization checks. A logged-in user must be induced to submit the crafted request; published scoring bounds the result to unauthorized data modification.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in Benner ModernaNet 1.2.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to alter data through a victim's browser. /DadosPessoais/SG_Gravar accepts an attacker-controlled idItAg value and processes the state-changing request without sufficient CSRF or authorization checks. A logged-in user must be induced to submit the crafted request; published scoring bounds the result to unauthorized data modification.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-1644
- Published
- Feb 25, 2025
- Updated
- Feb 25, 2025
- Vendor
- Benner Sistemas
- Product
- ModernaNet
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CWE-862, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 25, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Feb 25, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=1.0
- Affected versionversion=1.1
- Affected versionversion=1.2
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- CVE-2025-1644 proof-of-concept repository artifactproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo