Authenticated script execution via unencoded appId
Published Dec 29, 2025 · Updated Dec 29, 2025
Cross-site scripting in SohuTV CacheCloud 3.0 through 3.2.0 allows remote authenticated users to inject script via the appId parameter. The redirectNoPower method copies appId into the noPower view model without output encoding, causing the template to render attacker-controlled markup. A low-privileged account can submit the request, but another user must load the affected response for the injected script to run in that user's browser.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site scripting in SohuTV CacheCloud 3.0 through 3.2.0 allows remote authenticated users to inject script via the appId parameter. The redirectNoPower method copies appId into the noPower view model without output encoding, causing the template to render attacker-controlled markup. A low-privileged account can submit the request, but another user must load the affected response for the injected script to run in that user's browser.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-15201
- Published
- Dec 29, 2025
- Updated
- Dec 29, 2025
- Vendor
- SohuTV
- Product
- CacheCloud
- Classifications
- CWE-79, CWE-94, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 29, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 29, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=3.0
- Affected versionversion=3.1
- Affected versionversion=3.2.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GitHub issue 373 proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo