Authenticated code execution via unchecked client-name copy
Published Dec 6, 2025 · Updated Dec 8, 2025
Stack overflow in six Linksys RE extenders allows remote authenticated users to execute code via a crafted clientsname_0 value. AP_get_wireless_clientlist_setClientsName in mod_form.so copies the unchecked value into a stack-local buffer, overwriting its return address. A valid session cookie is required; an oversized management POST demonstrably crashes the device and enables return-address control.
Summary
What happened
Stack overflow in six Linksys RE extenders allows remote authenticated users to execute code via a crafted clientsname_0 value. AP_get_wireless_clientlist_setClientsName in mod_form.so copies the unchecked value into a stack-local buffer, overwriting its return address. A valid session cookie is required; an oversized management POST demonstrably crashes the device and enables return-address control.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-14133
- Published
- Dec 6, 2025
- Updated
- Dec 8, 2025
- Vendor
- Linksys
- Product
- RE6250
- Classifications
- CWE-121, CWE-119, CWE-787, T1210
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 6, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 8, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=1.0.013.001
- Affected versionversion=1.0.04.001
- Affected versionversion=1.0.04.002
- Affected versionversion=1.1.05.003
- Affected versionversion=1.2.07.001
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Oversized clientsname_0 POST proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo