Custom-field deletion via missing nonce validation
Published Dec 21, 2025 · Updated Dec 21, 2025
Cross-site request forgery in Web to SugarCRM Lead 1.0.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to delete custom fields via forged requests. The custom-field deletion handler in wpscl-admin-functions.php processes deletion requests without verifying a WordPress nonce. Exploitation requires an active administrator session and interaction with an attacker-controlled link; the bounded consequence is deletion of plugin custom-field configuration.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in Web to SugarCRM Lead 1.0.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to delete custom fields via forged requests. The custom-field deletion handler in wpscl-admin-functions.php processes deletion requests without verifying a WordPress nonce. Exploitation requires an active administrator session and interaction with an attacker-controlled link; the bounded consequence is deletion of plugin custom-field configuration.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-13361
- Published
- Dec 21, 2025
- Updated
- Dec 21, 2025
- Vendor
- Dipesh Patel
- Product
- Web to SugarCRM Lead
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-62, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 21, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 21, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=* <=1.0.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo