Stored script execution via unsanitized question edit
Published Nov 18, 2025 · Updated Nov 18, 2025
Stored XSS in SourceCodester Interview Management System 1.0 allows remote authenticated users to run scripts in other users' browsers. The editQuestion.php handler accepts script markup through the question-edit form without neutralization, stores it, and renders it when the page is refreshed. An authenticated account with question-edit access is required, and execution occurs in another user's browser under the application's origin.
Summary
What happened
Stored XSS in SourceCodester Interview Management System 1.0 allows remote authenticated users to run scripts in other users' browsers. The editQuestion.php handler accepts script markup through the question-edit form without neutralization, stores it, and renders it when the page is refreshed. An authenticated account with question-edit access is required, and execution occurs in another user's browser under the application's origin.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-13343
- Published
- Nov 18, 2025
- Updated
- Nov 18, 2025
- Vendor
- Online Computer and Laptop Store Project
- Product
- Interview Management System
- Classifications
- CWE-94, CWE-79, T1059.007
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 18, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 18, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=1.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GitHub issue 11 proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo