Unauthenticated sensitive data disclosure via message identifiers
Published Dec 2, 2025 · Updated Dec 2, 2025
Sensitive data exposure in Argus Teknoloji BİLGER before 2.4.9 allows remote attackers to read another client’s messages. The CNA maps the flaw to choosing a message identifier, but neither it nor the advisory identifies the affected endpoint or explains how BİLGER accepts an attacker-selected identifier. No authentication or user interaction is required; the reported consequence is limited to disclosure, with no integrity or availability impact.
Summary
What happened
Sensitive data exposure in Argus Teknoloji BİLGER before 2.4.9 allows remote attackers to read another client’s messages. The CNA maps the flaw to choosing a message identifier, but neither it nor the advisory identifies the affected endpoint or explains how BİLGER accepts an attacker-selected identifier. No authentication or user interaction is required; the reported consequence is limited to disclosure, with no integrity or availability impact.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-13295
- Published
- Dec 2, 2025
- Updated
- Dec 2, 2025
- Vendor
- Argus Teknoloji A.Ş.
- Product
- BİLGER
- Classifications
- CWE-201, CAPEC-12
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 2, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 2, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <2.4.9
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo