Contributor-level event disclosure via unchecked duplication
Published Dec 3, 2025 · Updated Jan 9, 2026
Authorization bypass in MotoPress Timetable and Event Schedule before 2.4.16 allows remote authenticated users to disclose arbitrary events. The event-duplication action accepts an attacker-chosen post ID and copies the referenced event without checking whether the requester can access it, exposing the copied event contents. Contributor access and a valid action nonce are required, and exploitation creates a duplicate event while disclosing the source event data.
Summary
What happened
Authorization bypass in MotoPress Timetable and Event Schedule before 2.4.16 allows remote authenticated users to disclose arbitrary events. The event-duplication action accepts an attacker-chosen post ID and copies the referenced event without checking whether the requester can access it, exposing the copied event contents. Contributor access and a valid action nonce are required, and exploitation creates a duplicate event while disclosing the source event data.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-12954
- Published
- Dec 3, 2025
- Updated
- Jan 9, 2026
- Vendor
- JetMonsters
- Product
- Timetable and Event Schedule by MotoPress
- Classifications
- CWE-639, T1213
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 3, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jan 9, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <2.4.16
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- WPScan contributor duplicate-event proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo