Command execution via manipulated Denodo LookML
Published Nov 24, 2025 · Updated Nov 24, 2025
Command injection in Google Cloud Looker allows remote authenticated users with Developer access to execute commands on the host. A Developer can create a Denodo-driver database connection and manipulate LookML so Looker processes attacker-controlled content through a command path without adequate validation. Exploitation requires authenticated Developer permissions, the ability to create the Denodo connection, and control of LookML; successful execution compromises the Looker host.
Summary
What happened
Command injection in Google Cloud Looker allows remote authenticated users with Developer access to execute commands on the host. A Developer can create a Denodo-driver database connection and manipulate LookML so Looker processes attacker-controlled content through a command path without adequate validation. Exploitation requires authenticated Developer permissions, the ability to create the Denodo connection, and control of LookML; successful execution compromises the Looker host.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-12741
- Published
- Nov 24, 2025
- Updated
- Nov 24, 2025
- Vendor
- Google Cloud
- Product
- Looker
- Classifications
- CWE-20, T1059
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 24, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 24, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <24.12.108
- Affected versionversion=0 <24.18.200
- Affected versionversion=0 <25.0.78
- Affected versionversion=0 <25.12.10
- Affected versionversion=0 <25.14
- Affected versionversion=0 <25.6.65
- Affected versionversion=0 <25.8.47
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo