Unauthenticated product deletion via spoofable IP authorization
Published Dec 6, 2025 · Updated Apr 8, 2026
Improper authorization in Garidium g-FFL Cockpit 1.7.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to delete WooCommerce products via REST requests. The queue and process endpoints rely on get_client_ip(), which trusts user-controlled X-Forwarded-For or CF-Connecting-IP values and compares them with a hardcoded allowed address. No account is required; spoofed requests can permanently remove selected product posts, metadata, term relationships, and images.
Summary
What happened
Improper authorization in Garidium g-FFL Cockpit 1.7.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to delete WooCommerce products via REST requests. The queue and process endpoints rely on get_client_ip(), which trusts user-controlled X-Forwarded-For or CF-Connecting-IP values and compares them with a hardcoded allowed address. No account is required; spoofed requests can permanently remove selected product posts, metadata, term relationships, and images.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-12720
- Published
- Dec 6, 2025
- Updated
- Apr 8, 2026
- Vendor
- Garidium
- Product
- g-FFL Cockpit
- Classifications
- CWE-285, T1190, T1485
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 6, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 8, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.7.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- d0n601 header-spoofing proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo