Credential theft via unchecked comment-sync destination
Published Nov 1, 2025 · Updated Nov 1, 2025
Information exposure in Discourse WP Discourse 2.5.9 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to steal Discourse API credentials. The comment-sync path reads a post's discourse_permalink custom field as the request destination and forwards Api-Key and Api-Username headers without validating its host. Author-level access is sufficient to point synchronization at an attacker-controlled server, exposing the credentials and enabling requests to internal services.
Summary
What happened
Information exposure in Discourse WP Discourse 2.5.9 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to steal Discourse API credentials. The comment-sync path reads a post's discourse_permalink custom field as the request destination and forwards Api-Key and Api-Username headers without validating its host. Author-level access is sufficient to point synchronization at an attacker-controlled server, exposing the credentials and enabling requests to internal services.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-11983
- Published
- Nov 1, 2025
- Updated
- Nov 1, 2025
- Vendor
- Discourse
- Product
- WP Discourse
- Classifications
- CWE-200, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 1, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 1, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=* <=2.5.9
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo