Stored XSS via unvalidated lazyload margin setting
Published Nov 1, 2025 · Updated Nov 1, 2025
Stored XSS in Flying Images 2.4.14 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to inject scripts through the lazyload margin setting. The settings handler stores the administrator-supplied margin without adequate validation, allowing it to be emitted into generated lazy-loading JavaScript without sufficient escaping. Administrator access is required, and exposure is limited to multisite installations or sites where unfiltered_html is disabled; injected code runs in visitors' browser contexts.
Summary
What happened
Stored XSS in Flying Images 2.4.14 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to inject scripts through the lazyload margin setting. The settings handler stores the administrator-supplied margin without adequate validation, allowing it to be emitted into generated lazy-loading JavaScript without sufficient escaping. Administrator access is required, and exposure is limited to multisite installations or sites where unfiltered_html is disabled; injected code runs in visitors' browser contexts.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-11927
- Published
- Nov 1, 2025
- Updated
- Nov 1, 2025
- Vendor
- Gijo Varghese
- Product
- Flying Images
- Classifications
- CWE-79, T1059.007
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- admin
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 1, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 1, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=* <=2.4.14
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo